top of page

Important Steps Of Making An Effective Design Review

 

The complexity in electronic and RF systems has become even tighter and this has made the design phase very important. Fixing an error made in the manufacturing phase would be less expensive to fix compared to an error made in the design phase of a project. The design peer reviews are therefore the best tools in an engineer's toolbox that can be used to catch design errors. Any life cycle of the product can bear this. It is therefore necessary that you understand the steps of making reviews given below that goes hand in hand with the Bliley technology.

 

Your team should have a number of independent reviewers. The function of the team is to be able to push the work to desirable levels. Try new reviewers if you wish to get fresh perspective of a given product each time. Also you can get rid of the ignorance that is in those who have been there for quite some time who will think that they know so much in the respective fields. Some people tend to ask their buddies to do their reviews. This could be a good thing but it will never give you the best of results. It is therefore necessary that you have a team of independent reviewers if you need good results in this case.

 

You should be in a position to stop a meeting if there is need. Take this scenario to be a good example. This group of reviewers from  OCXO is going to meet in a few after sometime with a lot of reviews to do. The chairman then finds out that there are not enough complete reviews in the meeting. The meeting is dismissed with immediate effects by the chairman. Your team needs to have adequate time so that they complete the review work they have. There is nothing you are going to get out of a review that is not complete. Be keen enough to understand that dismissing a meeting where the reviews are not complete is the right thing to do.

 

Before you can start to do a review make sure you consider your emotions and feelings first. Make the work as professional as possible. You can say that an artist is one thing with his/her paint and also say that a composer and his/her song are one; this concludes that an engineer's identity in this case is the design review. If you are unwell emotionally the work of questioning that may arise may not go well for you. There is much to lose in this case for every reviewer that lets feelings take over them. To sum up, the reviewers are supposed to avoid charging attacks and comments based on their emotions.  To learn more about technologies, visit this website at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology.

 

If you have problems taking notes on the design reviews from quartz crystal oscillator you can always ask for help. Try not to underestimate the fact that there are other important things that these people could have attended to even though the meeting is so important. You need to give the meeting a worthy reason of bring all the highly paid engineers to the room.

bottom of page